Understanding Of The Characters Of Heroes example essay topic

In the discussion which way is the best to get to understand the character of a society, many opinions have emerged. One of them is that to understand the characters of the he ores or heroines the society has choosen as the elites is the best method. In my opinion, to judge the true inner characters of a certain society, the comprehensive consideration of all aspects is required. That is, heroes can not be taken as the criterion to judge the attribution of a society in that the characters of heroes and heroines are insufficient to determine the character of a society.

First, it is absolutely the case that heroes and herones do to a large extent stand for some of the characters of a society. society chooses them as the elites because what they do have greatly qualify the moral standard of its people. Thus the choosen celetrities actually show the preferences of society and the qualities to be adored by its people. To understand the characters of a society, the positive aspect of the society should be taken as an important criterion. After all, the propensity of a society can actually reflect the likes and dislikes of its people, who contributed mostly to the establishment of social value. Thus, it is undoubtly sound to get to understand the characters of heroes and herones as the way to explore the character of a society. In fact, through the research of the personality of the celetrities of many countries, many achievements have been gained in the understanding of the certain society.

The independent character of Americans can be reflected on the hero of the nation, George Washington, and the unambitious qualities of Chinese people can be discovered from the activities of heroes in China. However, to explore the character of a society only by understanding the positive aspect is insufficient. The so-called discoveries which are merely procured in the research of the elites are not so convincing in that they lack in the comprehensive observation. The defect can be overcome by thorough investigation of the common likes and dislikes of ordinary people. The reactions of ordinary people toward the social events can reflect the negative aspects of social character, which is, what the society dislikes or disdains.

The two opposite aspects considered comprehensively, the understanding of society could be convincing and reason abel. Not only can we gain the information about what the society dislikes by the investigation of ordinary people, but also the propensities of the society as the research over heroes can offer. To conclude with, the best way to understand the character of a society is to get to know what the members of the society actually like and dislike, not the emphasis over social elites. Additional, it is not contrary that both the understanding of heroes and the observations over ordinary social members are taken as the methods to understand the characters of the society. Once established the primary position of the investigation of common members, researchers also need additional ways to gain complementary information. Even the comprehensive understanding of the society is achieved, the understanding of the characters of heroes can serve as the ancillary source of information to make the moral standard of the society more clear.

To conclude with, the comprehensive consideration of all aspects should be taken to understand the character of a society, which determines the sole exploration of social elites is insufficient. Primarily should researchers place their concentration over the ordinary moral standard of ordinary people. The understanding of social character can be accomplished greatly and take the research over heroes and heroines can eventually make the work perfect.