Use Corporal Punishment With Children example essay topic

Corporal Punishment of Children: When Family Issue Become Public Concerns Corporal punishment is a rising concern in Canada. On top of that Canada is getting scrutinize from the rest of the world for allowing parents to use reasonable force to punish children. Earlscourt Child and Family Center in metro Toronto deals with family and abuse. Parent's educators help parents deal with other techniques then hitting or spanking to non-violent methods such as time out and work chores.

Parents who use corporal punishment with children tend to see parents / child conflicts as power struggle, a threat to parental authority, which parents won t allow. Many advocate for physical punishment believes this is the best form of discipline. Believing that a reasonable deliver spanking is better than yelling and degrading verbally. Some researcher suggest that parents who tends to spank a lot puts children at risk as adults for a range of problems from sadomasochistic fantasies to violent intimate relationships. In Canada children are people who do not enjoy security of person. Section 43 of the criminal code allows reasonable force in the discipline of children.

It allows criminals to leave children with bruises and broken bones, without going to jail. This section has been used successfully in the defense of adults. Our society is hesitant towards children, children have not often been considered precious for Canada sake. Canada society debates on the question of whether children are the property of their parents or citizens of the country who require special protection due to their developmental vulnerability. Who are responsible, parent's educators who recommend spanking tend also to recommend a limited role for the state in the growth and development of children.

The responsibility rest, they would claim, with the children's parents. They also tend to seek minimal state interference in how parents discipline their children Those opposed to corporal punishment of children tend to view the state as legitimately involved in protecting children by promoting non-violent parenting techniques, passing strong child abuse laws, and supporting those raising children through a range of government-funded programs. Parent educators who promote non-violent, non-degrading parenting approaches have a different hope for the world than those who promote spanking, even in its mildest forms. Their hope is for a civil society where the special where the special needs of its child citizens are met, where intimate relationships are based on mutual respect, and where communities feel safe and are indeed safe. Comments This article deals with corporal punishment and children. In my view this article is a little one sided for against corporal punishment.

Because the author who wrote this is a parent educator at a facility and he deals with parents and try to teach them other methods of punishment. This is a good article and it brought out a lot of things I have no clue corporal punishment will do to kids when they turned into adults. Like turning into a sadomasochist, that was interesting. Also I was surprised that Canada is so soft towards corporal punishment while the rest of the world condemns us for being so. Like I said before the author leans towards on side but he still presents a good side for people who believe in corporal punishment. My mom would use corporal punishment to show who's the boss and that no way in hell would she lets us be in control to the point that she would fear us.

Which you hear everyday where kids would hit and abuse their parents because the parents weren t using parental authority. They also tend to seek minimal state interference in how parents discipline their children. Those opposed to corporal punishment of children tend to view the state as legitimately involved in protecting children by promoting non-violent parenting techniques, passing strong child abuse laws, and supporting those raising children through a range of government-funded programs.