Way To Clone Body Organs example essay topic
Cloning has its cons, but its pros seem to overcome them greatly. Cloning is a scientific innovation that will significantly enhance the lives of people around the world. If cloning were allowed to be experimented, scientists would be able to develop a way to clone body organs, which are an exact replica of an individual body organ. This would prove to be extremely beneficial to a person who may have lost a body organ such as a kidney.
Scientists could clone that particular organ for the individual, which, in the long run, would work better than a transplanted organ. Cloning will certainly expand the scope of medicine greatly, thus enhancing the possibilities of conquering diseases such as the Parkinson's disease, cancer and other diseases that were earlier considered incurable. Cloning could be used to increase the population of endangered species of animals and thus save them from total extinction. This would help maintain a natural balance on the earth and have a continuous natural life cycle.
Cloning could produce livestock with ideal characteristics for the agricultural industry and be able to manufacture biological products such as proteins for humans. Around the world, millions of people could be fed by making crops suitable for desert terrains. This can all be done with advances in genetic engineering! Cloning could certainly benefit couples who are infertile and want to have a child of their own, thus they could use cloning to produce a baby with their similar characteristics. In fact they may be able to even choose the characteristics of their child.
So the parents of the child could make sure that he or she is not born with any defects or diseases. Some people would suggest that cloning is unnatural and not ethically correct but so would be taking medicine when someone is ill. The whole idea of the modern medicine world in based on unnaturalness, so it seems cloning would be part of that modern medicine world. There are some restrictions that have to be made by the government so everyone is not walking around with their own clone.
However, why should cloning be denied as a scientific achievement when it can clearly save millions of lives? Cloning could be used in various ways to benefit the lives of humans. It is inevitable that cloning, at some stage, will play an important, if not vital, part in our lives. Therefore it is about time that society accepts this fact and lifts all constraints upon cloning so more research can be carried out and help eliminate any risks associated with it. The advances in cloning can only help mankind and in no way can do harm. The only argument against cloning is a moral issue.
If cloning could save a life, then there is no reason why it should not be done.