William Shakespeare's Great Play example essay topic

Compare and Contrast Essay In 1991, William Shakespeare's great play "Macbeth" was re-created into a modern day version titled "Men of Respect". Was the plays textual fidelity lost in transition during the making of the film, or did the film show total loyalty and devotion to the text and the feelings of the play? A closer examination of the characters / lines, classification between good and evil, and the use of light and dark will compare the many differences and similarities between William Shakespeare's "Macbeth" and William Reilly's "Men of Respect". Set in present day New York (present as in 1991), the various warring kingdoms of the play become organized crime factions in the film, King Duncan becoming the 'padrino' or godfather of the main 'family,' Charlie Di " Mico. His chief lieutenant, Mikey Bataglia is, of course, the corollary to the treacherous Macbeth.

The character of Lady Macbeth (Ruthie Bataglia) remains instinctive yet ruthless in her goal to get Mikey to become the "padrino". William Reilly at times stuck to Shakespeare's original version word for word. Other lines were re-worked for the modern audience, such as Lady Macbeth's speech that states "They have made themselves, and their fitness now does unmake you. I had given suck, and know how tender 'tis to love the bebe that milks me: I would, while it was smiling in my face, Have pluck'd my nipple from his boneless gums, and dash'd the brains out, had I so sworn as you have done this".

(Act. 1 scene 7 53-58) Which becomes something like "I know what it is like to have a life inside me and squashing it out because it is too difficult right now... ". Replacing the original with a reference to abortion allows the modern audience to relate on a such a sketchy topic, but by doing this Reilly went away from the original plays meaning. The classification between good and evil is a big topic in both the play and the film. In Shakespeare's original version, Macbeth said " I could not say 'amen,' when they did say 'god bless!' " (Act.

2 scene. 2 29-30). Shortly there after Macbeth was talking to Lady Macbeth and he said "but wherefore could not I pronounce 'amen' I had most need of blessing, and 'amen's tuck in my throat". (Act. 2 scene. 2 31-32).

This symbolizes the great guilt that Macbeth feels. He has alienated himself from God, even though this was the time he needed to blessed the most by God. This is the start of Macbeth's great decent into insanity and evil. In William Reilly's version of this scene (which takes place in what seems to be a dark sewer) the lines remain very similar to Shakespeare's, with only a very few amount of words changed, still allowing the audience to be captured by Macbeth's true feelings In Macbeth, Shakespeare uses light and dark to bring out the ideas of good and understanding, and to show the audience the evil and hiding that takes place during the play.

Just like Shakespeare, Reilly used light and dark to distinguish between the change of character in Macbeth. Unlike Shakespeare, Reilly also used the colour red in many of his scenes. Red demonstrated evil, and whenever red was used, it was clear that death was near. For instance, just before Mickey killed Charlie, they showed a quick glimpse of Ruthie Bataglia. The light that shown on her face was blood red. The theme of light and dark in "Macbeth" is portrayed with the candles, the shadows, the sun, and the witches.

'From its supernatural opening to its gruesome climax, 'Macbeth' is the Shakespeare play that reads most like a film script. ' Daniel Rosenthal, Shakespeare on Screen. Which asks the good question, was the plays textual fidelity lost in transition during the making of the film, or did the film show total loyalty and devotion to the text and the feelings of the play? An examination of the characters / lines, good and evil, and light and dark shows that the main feeling of the play remained the same, as it was acted out in the movie "Men of Respect". However, the textual obligations changed too much, as William Reilly changed Shakespeare's old English play into a modern film.