Would A Better Place In Corporations example essay topic

When Corporations Rule the Worldly David C. KortenThere is not a very positive view of people in this book. The ideal that people are naturally bad is an overwhelming concept in the book, When Corporations Rule the Wold by David Korten. The book examines the nature, recent developments, and policies of corporations around the wold. Korten find nothing good or positive, instead he focuses on how corporations are like cancerous tumors on America and how we can rid ourselves of these cancers.

He sees the planet's living spaces being eaten up for the benefit of powerful corporations and financial institutions. He sees these once useful institutions turning into instruments of a market tyranny that are destroying livelihoods, displacing people, and feeding on life in an insatiable quest for money. It forces us all to act in ways destructive of our families, communities, our nature, and ourselves. He believes human survival depends on a community-based, people-centered alternative beyond the failed extremist ideologies of communism and capitalism. This alternative is already being created through the initiatives of millions of people around the world who are taking back control of their lives and communities to create places where people can live and grow in balance with the living earth. He sees different programs and ideologies as being outdated, useless, or simply doing more harm than good.

Growth and free trade become in our modern culture that only rarely do we find the courage to ask why they should be given precedence over the needs of people and nature? One of the things that Korten does throughout the book is put in predictive some of the things that are necessary for a Corporation to be competitive, thing not long ago seen as vital parts of business. He reminds us that markets and trade have essential roles in a world of just and sustainable societies. He then makes clear, however, that they have no legitimate function other than as means to meet human needs. In the end, the most important test of the legitimacy and performance of any economy is the extent to which it assures the right of every person to a means of livelihood adequate to support full and healthy living. This humanitarian view is one that personifies business and makes it seem to be the government.

Imparting ideals of people that are trying to make the would a better place in corporations. By his standard, most of the world's economies are failing miserably, including the U.S. economy. He says that it should not be a difficult standard to meet given present levels of technology and organizational expertise. However, it requires making markets accountable to all people, not simply those with the most money. This means that markets and trade must both function within a framework of rules established and enforced by open, democratically accountable governments. He sets forth ideals that limit corporations power and influence over the Media soaked American public.

It will take a committed effort on the part of civil society to design and put in place an economic system supportive of economic justice and environmental sustainability. This system is as follows: Prohibit political advertising on television. TV political ads are far more often misleading than informative, extremely expensive, discredit the political system, and give money inordinate power in deciding elections. Place strict limits on individual campaign contributions. The principle of democracy is one person one vote, not one dollar one vote. Place strict limits on campaign spending.

We want to know what a political candidate can do with a limited budget, not how effectively he or she can manipulate us with large amounts of money. Strip corporations of their fictitious human rights. Take appropriate legislative action to put aside the legal fabrication created by a corrupted court system that corporations have the same rights as individuals. Only living things have natural rights. Get corporations entirely out of politics. Corporations are public bodies created by public charter to serve a public purpose.

It is the responsibility of the corporation so created to obey the rules that people chose to set for them, not make the rules. Therefore, corporations should be barred from making political contributions of any kind. Indeed, they should also be barred from any involvement in politics and political advocacy-including the solicitation of their employees, shareholders, sales outlets, and suppliers to make either political contributions or representations on political or public policy matters. Corporate charitable contributions should also be prohibited in recognition of their widespread abuse to advance corporate political aims.

The corporation's workers and individual shareholders-not corporate management-should make their own decisions as to how their shares of corporate income will be allocated for political and charitable purposes. This views to me are absolutely deplorable, ignorant, and unjust. This entire book makes me very angry in general. I had no Ideal where to start tearing down this man and his book. I felt that I could not honestly critique the book because he is tearing down the country, court system, that I wish to join. However, I can comment about these solutions.

They are simply unconstitutional. No one has the right to tell me what I can do with my money or my business. It is my god given right as an American to make all the money I want and do with it want I want. We, in this country, have a hard enough time getting people to participate and he wants to tell me that just because I own a business I can't? His views are utopian at best. I would say they fall closer to ridicules and un-American.

I can't write any more, I feel sick, I think I need to watch Rocky 4 now. Eliminate the concentration of media ownership. To avoid concentration of media power and assure a diversity of political voices, the communications media should be subjected to strict anti-trust provisions prohibiting any single individual or corporation from owning more than one major electronic or print media outlet. This would both increase the diversity of independent editorial voices and strengthen competition in the media industry. Take back the corporate charter. Facilitate citizen action to withdraw the charters of corporations that demonstrate disregard for the law or otherwise fail to serve the public good.

Reclaiming Our Economic Spaces. One of the fundamental points on which Adam Smith and Karl Marx agreed is that workers should own their means of production. Though not widely noted, in the small enterprises of Adam Smith's ideal economy the worker was generally also the owner and manager. Furthermore, Smith assumed that enterprises would be locally owned and that their owners would thus be imbedded in a framework of local community values and interests. While Smith believed in the benefits of trade, he considered it logical that most markets would be local because of the costs and uncertainties of trading with foreign lands. He took an especially dim view of large corporations with absentee owners that used their political and market power to extract monopoly profits..