Young Boy example essay topic
During most of the story, the boy comes off as extremely immature. So much so that it would be difficult for such a person to appreciate true love and / or have an emotional breakthrough. The first example of his immaturity that struck me was when he would watch Managan's sister. He would go so far as to peer between the blind and windowsill to catch a glimpse of his crush. When he caught sight of her, he would bolt outside to follow her. This seems to be very immature activity, which would be fitting for a boy his age.
He is self-absorbed (Crane, 398). He doesn't even seem to know his crushes name. To be in love with someone you hardly know, to me, is very irrational and juvenile. For one to make even a remotely sound opinion on this subject, one must examine the point of view of the narrator. The story is narrated by a mature man reflection upon his adolescence and the events that forced him to face the disillusioning realities of adulthood (Ratinov, 403). If you take a look at the language used throughout the story, you can tell the young boy himself does most certainly not narrate it.
An example of such language lies after Mangan's sister asks him if he is going to the bazaar: "I wished to annihilate the tedious intervening days" (Araby 396). Clearly that is not the vocabulary of an adolescent boy. I feel that if it was narrated by a young child he might have said something as simple as 'I can't wait'; straight and to the point, just like a child. The controversy that I referred to in my opening is centered on the last sentence. "Gazing up into the darkness I saw myself as a creature driven and derided by vanity; and my eyes burned with anguish and anger" (Araby, 398). Some people feel that this young boy actually is capable of moving "From Innocence To Insight" (Ratinov, 403).
This seems inconceivable, especially with what I have already pointed out about his immaturity. This boy would have had to suddenly rise to the maturity level of a middle-aged man in about 10 seconds to achieve the 'emotional epiphany' that some claim he has experienced. Having weighed the language usage, the maturity level (or lack thereof), and my own knowledge about the way young children think, I have decided that the boy realized nothing about his true feelings the end of the story. This is not to say that looking back on his life, the narrator couldn't have accomplished this evaluation of his childhood, and by telling this story, letting the readers know what really happened. Many of us can remember back and recall stories about how silly we used to be and what mistakes we made when we were younger. He doesn't have the advantage of experience that older people do.
This young boy isn't old enough to know the difference between things such as lust, love, the real world, and a boy's fantasies. We, as adults, have the benefit of learning from our many mistakes that we made in our childhood years.