Major Communist Nations During The Vietnam War example essay topic
". . To give a global context to the US occupation of Vietnam: there was cut-throat tension between the democratic nations and communist regimes. The American public and the majority of industrialized nations were persuaded by arguments of the "Domino Theory" and Communism taking over the world, the support for initial involvement was present. After the Gulf of Tonkin incident America began escalation in the Kennedy and Johnson years. However with an absence of results in the late 60's support for the war disappeared as fast as it had arrived.
America, from the onset of the war did not have any precise strategies to achieve their goals. Vietnamese leader, Diem noticed this stating, "It was as if the United States could never quiet decide what policy to pursue". The official reason for US entry was to defeat the Communist threat. President Kennedy stated, "The enemy is the Communist system itself-implacable, insatiable, unceasing in its drive for world domination... ". There were two significant faults with this objective.
Firstly the Americans assumed that, without evidence, the Vietnamese people would be swung by the power of democracy. Secondly, disputes occurred between the major Communist nations during the Vietnam war: the Sino-Soviet split destroyed the idea of a unified world-wide takeover by Communist nations. Vietnamese scholar Luu Doan Huynh attacked the US many years later, .".. you were not only wrong, but you had, so to speak, lost your minds. Vietnam a part of the Chinese expansionist game in Asia? For anyone who knows the history of Indochina, this is incomprehensible". America was trapped, the original premise of invading Vietnam became void as the war progressed.
Military strategies used by the United States were ineffective. Many of them were inappropriate for their objective of "winning the hearts and minds" of the Vietnamese people and only incited resentment of the people. Search and Destroy missions, as well as the Strategic Hamlet Programme were flawed. Robert McNamera condemned Operation Rolling Thunder for which, .".. its goddamned bombing campaign that had dropped more on Vietnam than on Europe in the whole of World War II and we hadn't gotten a goddamned thing for it".
Henry Kissinger, in a secret memo, admitted to President Ford that "In terms of military tactics... our armed forces are not suited to this kind of war". One Admiral, cited by the Historian George Allen, stated "We should have fought in the north, where everyone was the enemy... where you didn't have to worry whether or not you were shooting friendly civilians... I remember two of our marines being killed by a youngster... ". On the other hand the North Vietnamese had a "people's will to resist". As Nguyen Co Teach described, "You (America) have your nuclear weapons.
We have our secrecy". Most importantly the Vietnamese had a common purpose which Gap proclaimed, "Our objective was national independence". Kolko briefly describes the conduct of the North Vietnamese, "The night virtually became the N LFs property, since it deprived the enemy of freedom to use most of his firepower. The exploitation of the rainy season was another method. The alteration and improvisation of tunnels and mines became a fine art". The resistance that Americans met proved to be too strong- technology and attrition were no match for the Vietnamese' ingenuity and spirit, this eventually led to their withdrawal.
Vietnam was known as the "Photographers war", journalists enjoyed unprecedented influence on the public. Canadian theorist Marshall McLuhan stated, "Television brought the brutality of the war into the comfort of the living room. Vietnam was lost in the living rooms of America-not on the battlefields of Vietnam". Opinionated leading figures also had an incredible power, notably Walter Cronkite and Martin Luther King. A key moment in the war was when Cronkite stated that America could not win, public approval for involvement dropped dramatically.
Throughout the war, media coverage troubled the US government. This was particularly true with such events as the My Lai massacre occurring which damaged the credibility of US involvement. "The second moon landing was on the front pages when the news from My Lai broke... With My Lai the heart of darkness came home to America".
Evidence of public dismay could be seen firsthand by officials, the Washington protest in 1967 was a clear example where 70,000 people demonstrated against the war and caused $1 million damage. Similar domestic upheavals became more common and were triggers for the US government to withdraw. A North Vietnamese attack in January of 1968, the Tet Offensive, stunned many American officials and members of the public at home watching images on television of the American embassy in Saigon being taken over. Kolko cited that, "Tet was the threshold in the war's development, a major turning point guaranteeing that the Revolution would not be defeated". The surprise Tet offensive convinced many people that the insurgency present in South Vietnam could not be overcome.
The decision to go to war was an extremely costly one, not only in terms of human lives but also economically. The war's budgeted costs rose steeply from $5.8 billion in 1966 to $20.1 billion in 1967 and finally to $26.1 billion in 1968, the total bill accumulated to $120 billion. This enormous economic cost created evident weaknesses in America's economy as the country slid into successive and record "twin deficits". Perhaps the most telling figure was America's stronghold in world trade which dropped drastically from 25% in 1964 to 10% by 1969.
The American people grew impatient with not receiving the economic benefits they had been used to in the preceding years and furthermore they watched millions of tax payer dollars being pumped into a war which many felt not unjustified. In 1968 President Nixon was voted into office with his headline policy being the withdrawal of troops from Vietnam under a system known as Vietnam ization. This essentially was the withdrawal of US soldiers while slowly increasing the responsibility to be given to the South Vietnamese army. The American voters' values and ideals of having a "peace with honour" were evident in Nixon's support and he needed to start leaving Vietnam to continue satisfying them.
Due to internal and external dilemmas, preceding and during the Vietnam war, America was forced to withdraw. By 1972 the pressure had amounted and Nixon withdrew the majority of troops from Vietnam. In the end opposition on the home front from the public whose attitudes were fashioned by the media and economic deterioration, implementation of ineffective strategies throughout the war and the fierce hostility the North Vietnamese put up, all proved to be too much for the US.
Bibliography
o Allen, G.W. None So Blind (2001) Ivan R Dee publishing, Chicago.
o Berman, L. No Peace, No Honor (2001) Free Press, New York.
o Bilt on, M & Sim, K. Four Hours in My Lai o Diem, B. In the Jaws of History (1987) Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
o Harper, J. War Without End (2000) 2nd Edition.
Longman, Melbourne. o Herring, G. America's Longest War (1996) McGraw-Hill, New York.
o Kar now, S. Vietnam: A history (1983) Viking Press, New York.
o Kolko, G. Vietnam: Anatomy of a War, 1940-1975 (1987) Unwin Paperbacks, London.
o McNamera, R.S. Argument Without End (1999) Public Affairs, New York.
o Sanders, V. Access to History: The USA and Vietnam 1945-75 (1998) Hodder & Stoughton, London.
o Will banks, J. Abandoning Vietnam: How America left and South Vietnam lost its war (2004) University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.